Dear Mrs Babita
The slang used is very rude and insulting to female sex.
It essentially means that a woman has been screwing around (please
don't report me) in an adulterous relationship and has been caught in
the act.
The phrase originally was "don't bunch your boxers". It referred to
when a man was discovered screwing another man's wife and was
discovered by the furious husband who was banging down the locked
bedroom door. The adulterer while trying to put on his undershorts
(boxers) got them tangled (bunched / twisted) up and got panicked.
Later this was extended to the female sex with the term "bunch"
replaced by "twist" and "boxers" by "panties".
Legally speaking though, the Indian Supreme Court has repeatedly held
that obscenity has to be put in its proper place and perspective.
Since Rajeshwar Rao is in USA where the moral standards are lower and
you have provoked him repeatedly on this group, it is unlikely that a
successful prosecution would result, although you would probably
garner some sympathy and publicity.
Veeresh
--- In rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com, Babita Singh
<babitasinghindia@...> wrote:
>
> dear all ,
> Â
> please go through mail by k. rajeshwar rao and tell me if the slang used is all okay or i should report the matter to national commission for women and file a FIR with police also .
> Â
> Â legal advice on the matter shall be of great help.
> Â
> regards
> Â
> babita singh
> Lucknow-226017, India
>
> --- On Thu, 11/18/10, young cyber indians <cyberyouth@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: young cyber indians <cyberyouth@...>
> Subject: Re: [rti4empowerment] AID obtains IB's list of RTI activists with suspected terrorist links
> To: "Babita Singh" <babitasinghindia@...>
> Date: Thursday, November 18, 2010, 7:30 PM
>
>
> Dear madam, don't get your panties in a twist. Your name is not in those lists. Perhaps it is because you are not a great personality like jetwa.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Babita Singh <babitasinghindia@...> wrote:
>
> if u have any such authentic list , make it public .
> Â
> or else stop spreading all this nonsense about great personalities like late amit jethwa.
> Â
> i am sure this is a conspiracy to finish the real rti movement in india .
> Â
> babita singh
>
> Â
>
>
> --- On Thu, 11/18/10, young cyber indians <cyberyouth@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: young cyber indians <cyberyouth@...>
> Subject: [rti4empowerment] AID obtains IB's list of RTI activists with suspected terrorist links
>
> To: dhirendra.rti@...
> Date: Thursday, November 18, 2010, 1:24 PM
>
>
> Â
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Friends
>
> After filing an RTI petition to Indian Consulate in US, AID was denied the confirmed list of RTI activists in India whose telephones and internet were being intercepted by IB. The information was denied to us on grounds that IB is exempted organisation in schedule of RTI Act CPIO of M.E.A also did not transfer the RTI application to IB as is compulsory under section 6 f RTI Act. CPIO also submitted that "RTI activist" is not a defined term and no such information exists / maintained.
>
> In appeal, it was strongly argued that information pertaining to human rights violation cannot be denied, and that right to privacy is a basic human right. The matter was referred to Central Information Commission which directed the MEA to transfer request to IB to provide the list. We have received the list about 115 days after the CIC order but do not intend to complain as legal opinion sought by IB thereafter was also provided to us to explain the delay. The list of almost 600 names is shocking and even includes name of late RTI martyr Amit Jetwa.
>
> K Rajeshwar Rao
>
No comments:
Post a Comment