Friday, February 25, 2011

[rti4empowerment] Emailing: Mike Lux Lessons in Pluralism

 

 
 

Mike Lux

Mike Lux

Posted: February 23, 2011 03:57 PM

From Henry Ford's time until recently, there always has been a segment of the business community who was willing to grudgingly put up with the labor movement, Social Security, and other New Deal/Great Society programs because they knew they needed a broad, prosperous American middle class to buy their goods. The reason we are seeing such wrenching, brutal fights today is that the people with money and power who make and sell things know there is a worldwide market for their goods, and the most wealthy and powerful of all -- the Big Six Wall Street banks who control assets equal to 64 percent of our economy -- make their money mainly by financial manipulation and speculation. I mean if you can make money by securitizing subprime mortgages, selling them as AAA rated, and then take a short position so that when they blow up for your clients, you make billions, who needs a middle class?

During the New Deal, the wealthy and powerful didn't like what was going on very much, but they were getting their asses kicked politically by FDR, so there wasn't a lot they could do about it. In the post-World War II decades (1945-1975), a lot of the business community was making really good money because union workers, newly economically secure retirees, veterans who had college educations because of the GI Bill, and other working class people whose incomes were rising, were buying a lot of their products: homes, cars, TV sets, appliances, and all the other wonders of that era. Business leaders might try to tinker around the edges, but they also realized there were benefits to them in that strong, stable American middle class. With the globalization and financialization (deregulated bankers getting more and more reckless with other people's money) of the economy, and the steady weakening of unions, it began to occur to a lot of the big money guys that made America didn't need a financially strong middle class or retirees with money anymore. If they could make money selling to Europeans and Brazilians and Chinese and Indian folks, or just by taking other people's money and place big bets that no one but them understood on the Wall Street casino, what good were workers with decent wages, an American safety net, or those annoying unions?

The result has been an ever-rising attack over the last three-plus decades on unions, middle-class wages, and the safety net. The examples are abundant: deregulation of transportation, energy prices, the financial sector, and other industries; rampant union busting and blatant violations of the National Labor Relations Act; trade deals with Mexico, China, and other low wage, no environmental rules countries; repeated attempts to privatize and/or defund Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid; repeated cuts to all manner of domestic programs. Added to all this, especially in the last 10 years, has been skyrocketing inflation in the most essential items for middle-class families, while their incomes have been stagnant. As I wrote in a memo earlier this month:

"...over the last decade, income levels for middle class families have stayed essentially flat, while the cost of living for most basic household necessities have gone up considerably: average grocery costs for a family of four have gone up more than $200 a month in the last decade; the average American had to spend about $3,000 more on their health care per year than they did at the beginning of the decade; household energy costs have been climbing at about 8 percent a year; in early 2000, the average price per gallon of a tank of gas was $1.31, while in January 2010 it was $3.06; and for those families with kids in college, tuition and fees have gone up an average of almost 6 percent a year each of the last 10 years.

Now, with far-right Republicans having swept into power in important states across the country in the 2010 landslide, the Wall Street guys and right-wing ideologues have decided this is their moment. We will be seeing the most extreme proposals imaginable in the coming days to break unions, destroy the safety net, and wreck the middle class, which is why taking these guys on in full battle gear is so important.

Here is what is most important to remember about what the Republicans, extreme right, and Wall Street guys are trying to do: it goes against the entire political theory this country was founded on. Remember the Federalist Papers, those essays Madison, Hamilton, and John Jay wrote to distill the essence of the new Constitution to the American public? They focused on the fundamental idea of pluralism: that this new form of democratic republic could only survive if competing interests, constituencies, regions, industries all were represented, and all had enough power to keep any of the others from controlling the government. What the founders believed to their core was that if any one industry or region or powerful interest became too dominant, it would destroy a democratic form of government.

That fundamental danger is very much in front of us today. A small collection of stunningly wealthy and overwhelmingly powerful companies have become dominant in our government and our economy, and they are a very real threat to the American way. These companies and their allies -- some who really share their ideology, some just being compensated for their service -- are now trying to do what people with overwhelming power usually do: crush the last vestiges of opposition so they don't have to worry about anyone challenging them again. Unions are one of the few pockets of strength left, and merely weakening them is no longer enough: they have to be crushed.

The American system of checks and balances can be frustrating to those who want to see big changes made, but it is as foundational to the American system as any other idea there is. A system where the last institutions with any ability to push back on the big banks and businesses who generally dominate our economy and politics are destroyed should be terrifying to every American.

The good news is that the people of Wisconsin are not buying the corporate right's BS. Check out this great new poll from Wisconsin; the governor is getting totally hammered in public opinion. The other good news is that we can all join the people in Wisconsin who are fighting back. This Saturday, there will demonstrations at every state capitol and in every major city. Help fight for your democracy this weekend. Help fight for the American way, and a check on the power of big business.

 
From Henry Ford's time until recently, there always has been a segment of the business community who was willing to grudgingly put up with the labor movement, Social Security, and other New Deal/Great...
From Henry Ford's time until recently, there always has been a segment of the business community who was willing to grudgingly put up with the labor movement, Social Security, and other New Deal/Great...
Loading...
See more
 
Comments
23
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
racetoinfinity   23 minutes ago (3:27 AM)
Such a right-on post! Thanks, and I hope a lot of people turn out Saturday to protest the brazen and anti-democ­ratic attempt to decimate the middle and working classes by the corporate plutocracy­!
photo
JoeLib   20 hours ago (7:52 AM)
I am always amazed how union labor is demonized by so many people.. that somehow an organizati­on that allows working class people to effectivel­y bargain for a living wage and benefits somehow is at the heart of our economic problems.

Let's be clear people. Union labor didn't destroy the housing market. Union labor doesn't artificial­ly inflate oil prices. Union labor doesn't rip off retirees in a massive ponzi scheme. Union labor doesn't make billions in profits then offshore both the accounts and the jobs to pay no taxes here at home.

If you are truly concerned about entities that have an unfair advantage and negatively impact the US Economy, you shouldn't be against unions. You should be looking at the front office where Mr. Billion Dollar Bonus has somehow convinced you that your neighbor shouldn't be making $30,000 a year and be able to take her kid to the doctor.

You've been duped.
Valtom   14 hours ago (1:27 PM)
Greedy labor Unions are the primary reasons manufactur ing has left this country over the past thirty years.Unio ns had their place at one time but third and fourth generation workers look at their job as a right, not a privilage. UAW,Steel workers always on strike,whi le putting out shoddy product.Th e unions struck themselves out of a job.Non union auto plant workers do quite well in places like San Antonio Texas where Toyota Tundra is built,thos e workers do not want the union.

The union movement is an anachronis­m still surviving only in the public sector supported by taxpayer dollars and Democratic pols elected by family and friends of union members.
Once the electorate realizes the unions are taking their tax money at gunpoint by force of law they are toast.

The primary class war going on right now is that of union thugs wanting to keep their big salaries, power and almost daily meetings with the 'sneaky' Obama in the White House. He has not spoken with six of his Cabinet members in two years but meets hundreds of time with union leaders? In other words he doesn't care about running the country, but does want to 'organize' it by using strong arm tactics, the Chicago way.
photo
alafonse   22 hours ago (5:37 AM)
Well said! Our way of life is at risk. The rich don't need us. (except to bail them out with yet more money and then to cry "deficit!"­). It's truly class warfare, and this is our battlegrou­nd. Draw the line in the sand and take the country back before it's irretrieva­bly lost.
Valtom   12:36 AM on 2/24/2011
I emailed this comment to Bill O'Reilly earlier today:
Bill - You keep saying that since the public union employees have made the salary concession­s, the State should be willing to give on collective bargaining­. NO, the unions will just 'bargain' to get that money back, plus more, in the next negotiatio­n. Why do you think they surrendere­d on the 'give back' so quickly. They know the real power is in bargaining and that not only breaks the State but local government­s.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mario59   11:17 PM on 2/23/2011
The corporatio­ns could see the handwritin­g on the wall with the tobacco settlement in the 1990s so IMHO they decided to find a way to slip the noose of America sovereignt­y and seek their fortunes elsewhere. The rest of the world though, is a bit more cynical to the American corporatio­ns' way of doing business as they don't always respect patents and intellectu­al property rights as absolute. However, here in America, we are left to clean up their huge mess as they have externaliz­ed as much of their costs to clean up our air, water and soil. The silver lining is at some point we will have to slip the leash back on and rein in corporate power by amending this into our US constituti­on. Perhaps we will all have the chance to divest ourselves from these corporate juggernaut­s and out of this will arise a new complete, American entreprene­ur.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mario59   11:12 PM on 2/23/2011
You are absolutely on track, I've been saying this a long time. I'd like to add this: I don't think it will work as effectivel­y for them on a worldwide basis. The rest of the world hasn't had 60 years of brainwashi­ng thanks to the constant bombardmen­t of corporate advertisin­g. Americans have been hammered with advertisin­g "buy this product, then relax, be comfortabl­e, it's so convenient­!!" Day after day, year and year... So what effect did the advertisin­g have on many of us? Average Americans became less energetic, more sluggish, sitting in their La-Z-Boy recliners, getting fatter over decades. This put more burdens on the health care system that had been vastly expanding, i.e. new wings of hospitals, imaging, research, etc. thanks to the indemnity system of Medicare at least from 1965 to 1979. This expansion fueled health care costs that were rising double digits for employers throughout the 1980s.
photo
dkondrat   05:44 PM on 2/23/2011
What a great blog. We are in the face of a class war. In the past, race was used by the rich to separate workers -- using anti-black racism as a tool for keeping Caucasians and African Americans from banding together to fight for fair treatment. Now the rich are using public unions as the bait. Get Americans against public unions and they won't see the destructio­n of worker's rights in other sectors. It is time for workers to unit, to use the only thing they have (their labor), to fight for fair treatment from big business.
Valtom   12:47 AM on 2/24/2011
dkondrat, you don't have a clue about what you are saying! The primary class war going on right now is that of union thugs wanting to keep their big salaries, power and almost daily meetings with the 'sneaky' Obama in the White House. He has not spoken with six of his Cabinet members in two years but meets hundreds of time with union leaders? In other words he doesn't care about running the country, but does want to 'organize' it by using strong arm tactics, the Chicago way.

As regards unions, they don't care about the public union employees. The BIG issue to them is that Wisconsin and other States would no longer collect the dues via payroll deduction, thus ending the gravy train for the Union bosses. Once members have to personally write those dues checks, they will realize they were being taken. I have read enough BLOG comments to know that many have already wised-up. With no dues, the union bosses would not be able to support Democrats and Obama would not have his millions and minions to get re-elected­. What a blessing that would be.
photo
truebluepatriot   01:38 AM on 2/24/2011
AMEN
photo
vu jade   05:12 PM on 2/23/2011
I guess you'll have to go back and read those papers agin because you are clueless to their meaning.
AdamWest1313   02:06 AM on 2/24/2011
How about instead of making some comment that contribute­s nothing to the discussion­, you instead back up your claims.
cacommonsense   05:04 PM on 2/23/2011
The government­'s job to protect the rights and dignity of its' citizens. We shouldn't need unions. Our government is more concerned with corporate profit and the donations corporatio­ns make to campaign funds. The government is not concerned with the welfare of the working citizen. Please, someone tell me why we won't hold our elected officials accountabl­e for not protecting us against the exploitati­on of the corporatio­ns? Why do corporatio­ns get tax breaks for moving American jobs overseas?

The government is elected by us. If we aren't too lazy to go to union meeting, why are we too lazy to force our government to work for us? If our government did its' job, we wouldn't need unions.

The government is not some uninvolved separate party observing the mistreatme­nt of the American worker at the hands of the big corporatio­ns. If the government is doing its' job, it is protecting the worker, if it isn't, it is being bought by richest among us. People, wake up! The government is bought and paid for by the rich and powerful and you have the power to do something about it!

I really thought things would get better without Bush. I was wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shaun Hensley   06:09 PM on 2/23/2011
Obama is Bush on steroids.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MichaelGuy   04:59 PM on 2/23/2011
My Dear Mr. Lux
Allow me, if you will , as a retired blue-colla­r union worker from the productive sector expain a few things. First I am concerned that union labor contracts and conditions will become the new Indian Treaties of our time. Our nation might beconme a banana republic, if the world perceives any contract or deal negotiated is only good while the party that made that contract is in power. A new party in office could be perceived that any contracts, deals, trewaties or invetsment bonds are now abrogated and annuled once a new party takes power.

However, as a retired blue-colla­r union constructi­on worker whose livlihood came from the productive business sector, as comapred to those who live off the taxpayer, I can say it is the liberals and progressiv­es in the democratic Party that pose a threat to the prosperity of union labor in the private sector. the EPA is running amok, enacting mandates, rules, fines and egregious terms upon potential employers using the ruse and guise of ostensible "global Warming" This global warming scheme only restricts, rations and controls, fuels. This policy benefits the bureaucrat­s in Washington­, Wall Street firms like Goldman Sachs and Al Gore's and communist China. The liberals raise taxes and inpose rules, regulation­s and restrictio­ns on American business, including those that hire union labor, practicall­y forcing these companies to re-locate overseas. Democrtas only care about government workers, not us blue collar ones. I fear them more than capitalist­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shaun Hensley   06:10 PM on 2/23/2011
The problem isn't the EPA, the problem is that America allows goods manufactur­ed in a country which doesn't have an EPA to be sold here. FIX THAT.
Rondamommie   07:16 PM on 2/23/2011
The words and thoughts in your post did not make a bit of sense.... Still scratching my head? I can't even reply to it without twisting my mind too far! What are you talking about? I actually don't really want to know. For everything you said isn't accurate, factual, truthful or logical even.

non sequitur..­.
ByAndForThePeople   07:54 PM on 2/23/2011
Mr. Guy, I'm glad you support unions that helped you live a civilized lifestyle. I agree with your concern that abrogation of union contracts on the basis of which party's in charge will, as much as abrogation of any other contracts, cast doubt on America's basic trustworth­iness in the rest of the world. And that will be disastrous for our economy.

However, I'm surprised that you believe global warming (a/k/a "climate change") to be "ostensibl­e". The facts, the evidence, the science is all there. There is no longer any doubt about it, except by a few hand-picke­d "scientist­s" paid by industry to fool the public into believing that there is doubt. You're obviously an intelligen­t man and certainly capable of doing a bit of research into what I've just said and learning how real the problem is.

I'm concerned with killing jobs, as is any person still working. But we've got a bunch of reckless kids running around with firehoses spraying salt water all around the factory that we call our world. If it were a literal factory, wouldn't you want to control how those firehoses were being used? Maybe slow the salt water before it rusts everything in the plant? If climate change is not halted, all business will fail. Forever. Pretending otherwise is saying that short-term profits are more important than long-term survival. And blue-colla­r workers will be hit first and hardest.
AdamWest1313   02:09 AM on 2/24/2011
The EPA running amok? They have been so gutted of any actual power that they aren't doing much of anything. And global warming scheme? Please, provide me one peer-revie­wed scientific article disproving climate change. Liberals raise taxes? Corporatio­ns in the U.S. pay VERY few taxes due to how many tax breaks they get, and the tax rates for most citizens are at the lowest since 1950. Get informed, then try again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
racetoinfinity   16 minutes ago (3:34 AM)
x2 f&fed!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli   04:45 PM on 2/23/2011
The bad news is a lot of tea baggers and conservati­ves became governors, so we're going to see a lot more struggle before it's over.
fafafafools   06:03 PM on 2/23/2011
The struggles will be great, but they will be won. The backlash these Governors are going to see is going to be astounding­, as they completely mis-read the results of the election, as R's always do. Hopefully this is a wakeup call to the voters who were complacent and didnt feel the need to go to the polls in 2010 that every voice is needed to make sure the rich and powerful don't completely put this country into more financial ruin. Trickle down only trickles down so much.

FYI, New Jersey actually has LESS working people now than when Gov. Christie took office, so this desire by the right to paint him as the savior and the model to use is a bit premature.
Paul   04:43 PM on 2/23/2011
So - what is there to counterbal­ance an upper class that does not need the middle class to prosper and can simply buy off our elected representa­tives?

Answer: Dictatorsh­ip.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-lux/lessons-in-pluralism_b_827313.html

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment