For years RTI Activists have been demanding from CIC/ SIC/
Concerned Govt Depts that the Second Appeal Appellants / Section
18 Complainants / 1st Appeal Appellants should be informed through
SMS system, as letters sent by CIC/ SIC/ Govt are not received by
Applicants in time due to Postal Delay as well as last minute posting
by CIC/ SIC office. On 15th August 2010, Bombay High Court's NIC Section had
started informing Remote Lawyer/ Litigant status of their case through
SMS. http://bombayhighcourt.nic.in/site/smsinfo.html Attached herwith documents in the subject matter . RTI Application was filed in Bombay High Court seeking infn
about SMS System 1) PIO Reply http://www.box.net/shared/oif3dzfss6 2) RTI Application http://www.box.net/shared/2lcth3p1ql A) Some Infn from CIC Inspection Report from Oct 2005 to Oct
2007 Pg 18
(a) Penalties amounting to Rs. 9,31, 625/ - Pending (b) Position of Pending Caes http://www.box.net/shared/sbzr76g8bx CIC Audit Report Pg 19 (a) Position of Pending Cases (b) SPEEDY ACTION MAY BE TAKEN TO DISPOSE OFF the
PENDING CASES under intimation to audit.. http://www.box.net/shared/7jb9mv0hkc B) Some Infn from office of Maharashtra Chief Infn Comner
Inspection Report from 12 Oct 2005 to 31.12.07
Implementation of RTI Act 2005, Non Levy & Recovery of Penalties
u/s 20(1) of Act SIC Audit Report Pg 4 , 5, 6 http://www.box.net/shared/ma26q9r9mq http://www.box.net/shared/9gket0ej4q http://www.box.net/shared/ix9iqf9xdg Also sharing some other infn from Inspection Report of AG office ( Delhi & Mumbai)
Said infn may be used at the time of writing suggestions to DoPT
respective SICs/ CIC / Govts Regards, Vihar
********
|
Friday, December 24, 2010
[rti4empowerment] Bombay High Court PIO > Objective of SMS Service : Remote Lawyer/ Litigant can know / verify status of their case through SMS.
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment