I feel personally extremely sorry that in place of having serious
discourse/debate on issues of public impotrance for furthering our
common interests,we're getting bogged down on inter-personal
trivia,and that ,too, in not so great taste.
May,I humbly submit to all my dear friends-fora notwithstanding--to
kindly concentrate on issues of our common interest? NATIONAL INTEREST
to be precise.
All along my four decades of self-less public service,I've striven for
organisational excellence,which is also reflected in my doctoral
thesis on KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT.
As regards improvement in poliving,yes,the importance has always been
known and not have efforts been made tirelessly to address the
issue(s) but in two significant and well acclaimed published research
papers(CPNTEMPORARY POLICING:LEADERSHIP CHALLENGES and POLICE VISION
2020) the maladies amd remedies have been highlighted.
This is not the forum to dilate on that,I believe.Whoever peronally
wishes to interact could do so gladly please.Its my passion to work
for bringing about ORGANISATIONAL EXCELLENCE in policing(infact whole
of CJS).
Whoever has brilliant ideas could please contribute to our conjoint
efforts.Its after all not mine or thine issue but our combined issue
and we need to address and sort the same out conjointly only.
My last point of wishlist:
Lets remember that DECENCY IS BETTER PART OF CANDOUR,AS MUCH AS
DISCRETION IS BETTER PART OF VALOUR(a la Shaskepeare).
spm
IPS DGP retd
BE MBA PhD
On 12/2/10, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Urvi Sukul Singh" <usukulsingh@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 11:36 PM
> To: <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: "Judge Uncle Syndrome" in the High Courts
>
>> Mr Roy,
>> To me it appears your ideas are at odds with those of others besides me as
>>
>> well.You appear to be getting the wrong end of the stick and coming to the
>>
>> wrong conclusions.Besides,one does not have to stick to your phrases in
>> the fear of raising your ire.
>> I have corresponded in the past with Mr Mathur(he is also on the
>> rti4emp@yahoogroup),therefore,I do not see that he needs you to jump to
>> his defence.
>> To many of us fairness and transparency may have something in common.Once
>> again,one does not have to toe your line for fear of your questioning
>> one's motives.What gives you the right to appoint yourself as an
>> arbiter?Please accept that you are not always right.And,frankly,with this
>> I hope to end my correspondence with you.
>>
>> Urvi Sukul Singh
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Sarbajit Roy" <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 4:55 PM
>> To: <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
>> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: "Judge Uncle Syndrome" in the High Courts
>>
>>> Dear Ms Singh
>>>
>>> 1) I don't consider myself to be an activist. My views on activists
>>> (and especially RTI activists) are in the public domain.
>>>
>>> 2) I don't recall using the phrase "high-end". It resonates with say
>>> "high end" whore or "High class" prostitute.
>>>
>>> 3) I have never corresponded with Mr Rejimon for a very long time now.
>>>
>>> 4) You have now started coming across my posts because somebody has
>>> subscribed you to this group (after laying hands on the members list
>>> of rti4..@yg ..)
>>>
>>> 5) I am not spewing "venom". I am releasing material (almost
>>> exclusively govt records) into the public space which the
>>> establishment wants suppressed.
>>>
>>> 6) For me personally, the important things is that the "system" should
>>> be "fair". I am not asking for the system to be transparent. In fact
>>> my experience is that transparency runs counter to fairness. We need
>>> fair exams, fair courts, fair tribunals like the CIC/SICs.
>>> Whenever, I come across examples of unfairness, I shall post to this
>>> group (and other
>>> groups) with supporting evidence and if you still want to stop me then
>>> I must seriously
>>> question your motives.
>>>
>>> Sarbajit
>>>
>>> On 12/2/10, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mr Roy,
>>>> If you are considered a high-end RTI activist,then I will gladly bid
>>>> goodbye to the RTI groups.BTW,before you pass judgement,I would suggest
>>>> you
>>>> ask the people who are on the Group (and VERY REAL people,believe me,L
>>>> because I have met or spoken telephonically to many of them) as to
>>>> whether I
>>>> contribute positively or not.
>>>> Hardcore doesn't imply licence to kill(with rude words) it implies a
>>>> deep
>>>> commitment ,and I think we will have to put to the vote whether your
>>>> commitment is deeper than that of the the next man/woman.
>>>> I have witnessed your personal attacks on this Group on people,with
>>>> specific
>>>> reference to Mr Rejimon.For a long period in the middle ,I did not come
>>>> across your posts.You have,however,returned,and you are spewing venom
>>>> most
>>>> of the time,
>>>> I request the moderators of the Groups on which Mr Roy is a member,to
>>>> take
>>>> me off those Groups if I also figure in those lists.All except
>>>> rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com The rest of you,please carry on with
>>>> your
>>>> Group of high-enders!
>>>> Best of luck.
>>>> Urvi Sukul Singh
>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>> From: "sroy1947" <sroy1947@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 2:59 PM
>>>> To: "HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005"
>>>> <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: "Judge Uncle Syndrome" in the High Courts
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Ms Singh
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a group for hard=core RTI activists. Quite obviously ladies
>>>>> with weak constitutions are not up to digesting alot of what is posted
>>>>> to this group and most of which is quite frankly nausea inducing
>>>>> concerning the rampant corruption in the Info Commissions and the
>>>>> judiciary..
>>>>>
>>>>> I concur that a group like rti4empowerment@yahoogroups is the only
>>>>> group which will suit your delicate temperament. The moderator there
>>>>> is really scraping the bottom of the barrel if he permits posts from
>>>>> you and RSingh631 etc to his members (somebody else has already shown
>>>>> that half the member list over there is fake).
>>>>>
>>>>> PS: If you read the first post in this thread, you will find that it
>>>>> was not I who raised this issue/attack but the Law Commission of
>>>>> India.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sarbajit
>>>>>
>>>>> Urvi Sukul Singh wrote:
>>>>>> Mr Roy,
>>>>>> You suggest action against people making suggestions yet your
>>>>>> language
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> the tenor of you mails is absolutely unbearable at times.Time someone
>>>>>> took
>>>>>> action against you.Most of what one has read over the last few weeks
>>>>>> is a
>>>>>> load of rubbish,with you a regular participant.
>>>>>> I have requested being taken off all groups other than
>>>>>> rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.Kindly comply.Otherwise,till I get the
>>>>>> mails,if
>>>>>> I feel the need I will reply.
>>>>>> Urvi Sukul Singh
>>>>>> PS I find this attack on the judiciary very unseemly.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment