Sunday, December 22, 2013

Re: [rti4empowerment] RE: "innocent till proven guilty"

 

We also need to relook at the right of the accused to defend!
The accused has to tell the truth to his advocate about the crime and he formulates a line of defence, all cooked up! In case of a real accused the advocate help him misrepresent the case, and that is his source of livelyhood!! If the advocate is clever he can carry on the case for 20-30- or more years frustrating the real complainant who often appears to be the weakest! Accused, in the present set up of governance, has "connections"! Now inspite of all the efforts of the advocate to save the accused if the complainant wins the case is it not to be considered that the defence advocate and his henchman have been aiding and abetting the accused in wrongly presnting the case to the court, assuming that the court's stand is not supicious! In the circumstances the defense advocate and his henchman should be severely punished for taking the 20 or 30 years of the court time defending the accused!! This should serve as a deterent! This is my personal view, I am not a lawyer!!    


On Saturday, 21 December 2013 3:57 PM, Victor Cooper <victor99cooper@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
Dear Mr. / Ms. Congress, BJP, Aalu, SP, Babus, Judges, et al:
For a number of years we have been hearing from you this humbug revolving around the concept of "innocent till proven guilty" stuff.
Well, this concept would have been acceptable had you not converted us into a banana / mango type over the past 66 years since independence, and justice was swift, honest, and assured as it is intended to be in a properly functioning democracy.
So pals, meeeooow and bow-wow too. Why should you not be held "guilty till proven innocent". Why should you not face the same music that the ordinary citizen has to face with justice taking 20, 30, or 50 years?
After all, it was your foremost duty, which you failed to perform, to have increased the number of judges five-fold so that justice was swift, honest, and assured. Had you so performed your duty, the concept of "innocent till proved guilty" would have been fine. But under the given circumstances and conditions, it is appropriate that you be held to be "guilty till proven innocent".
 
So, stop whining. MMmmmmeeeeoooowwwww. Bow-wow.
 
Victor
 


__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment