-: [rti4empowerment] Re: [Janshakti] Re: Tainted Ministers

On the issue of justice, I have faced the incredibly bad music dished out by some of our"judges". e, I am all in favour of the proposed JAC. But the way it is framed, it reduces the role of judges to a minority level, which is not correct. Hence, I hope (and it probably will be) it will be held as unconstitutional when challenged.

At another level, it is far more important to introduce an effective and functioning accountability Bill, wherein they are not protected against criminal cases against them by private citizens, as some (many) of them are accomplices. Here, all courts should be audio-video taped, with retired judges performing random sampling of quality of judgements.

Victor

From: "Jai Raj Yadav yadavjr@yahoo.com [Janshakti]" <Janshakti@yahoogroups.com>
To: Janshakti@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Janshakti] Re: Tainted Ministers

Increase the number of Judges & court rooms and also equally , if not more, important to change the way courts work (leaves, holidays and working hours) , curtail frequent adjournments on one or other counts and frivolous cases and PILs filed by all and sundries.

Why should cases not be started and heard rather one or other group filing appeal that case hearing be stopped ?

Cases must be decides o continuous hearing basis

Jairaj Yadav

From: "Victor Cooper victor99cooper@yahoo.com [Janshakti]" <Janshakti@yahoogroups.com>
To: Janshakti@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, 30 August 2014 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Janshakti] Re: Tainted Ministers

What the SC has rejected is special treatment for politicians. Mr. Modi needs to increase the number of judges 3-fold so that everyone gets speedy trial, not just the politicians.
Pressurise Mr Modi.
Victor

From: "a d imemyself10020002000@yahoo.com [Janshakti]" <Janshakti@yahoogroups.com>
To: Janshakti@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Janshakti] Re: Tainted Ministers

Mr.Devinder,
Modi wanted to fast-track all the criminal cases against Politicians but Supreme Court refused.Media hailed it as a snub to Modi.So pl. come forward ,pressurise judiciary to expedite.
s.asim

From: "Jai Raj Yadav yadavjr@yahoo.com [Janshakti]" <Janshakti@yahoogroups.com>
To: Janshakti@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, 29 August 2014 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Janshakti] Re: Tainted Ministers

Yes Manmohan Singh never fought election and is not electable.

His statement while filing for Assam Rajyasabha seat that he is resident of Guwahati / Assam had been outright lieand that conduct of liar was reflected in his statements in Loksabha/Rajysabha on scam & corruption statements.

Jairaj Yadav

From: "Rabinder Koul ravindrakkoul@gmail.com [Janshakti]" <Janshakti@yahoogroups.com>
To: Janshakti@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Rabinder Koul <RavindraKKoul@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, 29 August 2014 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Janshakti] Re: Tainted Ministers

Manmohan Singh, who never fought an election & was PM of India.

Ravindra Koul
अस्मद्रूपसमाविष्ठ: स्वात्मनात्मानिवारणे
शिव: करोतु निजया नम: शक्त्या ततात्मने

On Aug 28, 2014, at 11:54 AM, devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com [Janshakti] <Janshakti@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

More recently, another Robo in BJP is my cousin Jaitley. who lost election from Amritsar and has been rewarded with two of the most crucial portfolios i.e Defence and Finance. Where can you find an equal example of rape of democracy. Devinder

From: "Ramakrishna Chitrapu rkchitrapu@hotmail.com [Janshakti]" <Janshakti@yahoogroups.com>
To: India Force Yahoo Groups <janshakti@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: [Janshakti] Re: Tainted Ministers

Ministers have to be MPs.. either RS or LS.. we have the great MMS who was never elected as MP.. only nominated RS MP.. that too from the safest seats from Congress nomination. The great lady wanted a Robo.. He was a perfect. Ramakrishna

Each day is a little life: every waking and rising a little birth, every fresh morning a little youth, every going to rest and sleep a little death.
Arthur Schopenhauer

CC: OldWorldKitchen@yahoogroups.com; sgthattey@gmail.com; sgthattey1@cs.com; ramesh.batra@freenet.de; bnatraj2002@yahoo.co.in; arvindgaitonde@yahoo.com; rdpotdar@wincssc.com; bhaivaidya@yahoo.com; Branded_Indian@yahoogroups.com; USBrahmins@yahoogroups.com; janshakti@yahoogroups.com; indianfirst@yahoogroups.com From: Janshakti@yahoogroups.com To: Janshakti@yahoogroups.com Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:10:48 +0530 Subject: [Janshakti] Re: Tainted Ministers

Avtar,
Some accusations are of political nature.
Like leading demonstration etc.

These are used by the men in power to subdue the opposition.
Pakistan's Bhutto was a master in foisting such legal cases.

But Zia_ul_Haq proved to be a super master and legally sent Bhutto to his gallows.
The Supreme Court Advice of yesterday basically concerns moral turptitude, corruption, extreme violence like murder etc.

The SoniaG led UPA's Governments under Manmohansingh had many such ministers led by Lalu_Prasad of the Chaaraa Ghotaalaa notoreity. He has been give jail sentence of 5 years but is moving freely under bail given by the Supreme Court. ( Was judge bribed? is a moot question asked)

A Central Minister has to be a M.P.
A member of Loksabha or Rajyasabha counts as M.P.

Bhalchandra G. Thattey
Shubham Bhavatu

Maitri, Karuna, Mudita, Upeksha
Chitta_Prasadanam

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:20 PM, A. M. Singh <am.singh@arcor.de> wrote:

http://www.thenewsreports.com/cant-interfere-says-sc-cabinet-pms-prerogative/9211/nandhakumar

Can't interfere, says SC; Cabinet is PM's prerogative

While looking the net for Indian news, I have come across this item. Surely NM does not have any tainted ministers in his cabinet – though the website seems to indicate that there are !! Nm wanted, above all, to have a clean administration and amongst others, root out corruption.

Any comments? Do ministers have to be MPs?

avtar