Friends,
It said- "It appears that the petitioner has made vague allegations. No cogent material has been put forth by the petitioner while raising her grievance." It even said that- "The petitioner seems to be interested for publication of her name in the newspaper while approaching this Court" The judgement also said- "The petitioner is ... wife of a police officer."The writ petition was dismissed as being misconceived. I have a few issues related with the decision- 1. The judgement talks of vague allegations while the Writ had very specifically mentioned the above-mentioned decision of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court itself had said- "a lot of complaints are coming against certain Judges of the Allahabad High Court relating to their integrity" and "There are other serious complaints also against some Judges of the High Court." I had only asked to enquire and take action against such judges regarding whom such complaints had come to the Supreme Court. I fail to understand how does it become vague allegation? When the Supreme Court said the above things in its judgement, they must have been based on specific facts. One just can't wash them away as being vague. 2. The High Court says that I approached the Court for publicity. I can't understand on what basis and what rationale have these unsubstantiated facts been made. 3. I had made no mention of being wife of a police officer, yet it was mentioned in the judgement. Can't a woman in India be treated as being an individual working in her own capacity, other than being a wife and a mother? These being the issues, I request all my learned friends to kindly suggest me further course of action because I want to take the matter to its logical conclusion, including my legal protests about Point No 2 and 3 presented above. Kindly help me out by responding at nutanthakurlko@gmail.com or nutanthakurlko@yahoo.in. I might be excused for repeating this message. http://nspindia.com/Essays%20Nutan.htm Dr Nutan Thakur, Secretary, IRDS, Lucknow 94155-34525 www.nspindia www.irdsindia.com www.nationalrtiforum.org |
Thursday, December 9, 2010
[rti4empowerment] Request for guidance on legal issue related with Justice Katju judgement
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment