Sunday, April 30, 2017

[rti4empowerment] Kashmir Chaos Springs From 2014 Polls, Alliance Hasn't Worked: Ex-Raw Chief

 

Ananya Chakraborty
 
In an exclusive interview with News18, Dulat interprets the ongoing unrest in Kashmir and talks about how New Delhi failed to capitalise on the opportunities to make progress in Kashmir.
Amarjit Singh Dulat has been one of Indiaâs most experienced and trusted men in Kashmir. He served in Kashmir as joint director of Intelligence Bureau from 1988 to 1990. He was later made the chief of the Research and Analysis Wing, and advised former Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee on Kashmir policy. He has also authored a book on Kashmir â Kashmir: The Vajpayee Years.
In an exclusive interview with News18, Dulat interprets the ongoing unrest in Kashmir and talks about how New Delhi failed to capitalise on the opportunities to make progress in Kashmir. He talks about how the present day Kashmir is worse off and tells why Mehbooba Mufti has failed where her father could have succeeded. Edited excerpts:
How bad are conditions in the Valley? How do you compare todayâs Kashmir with the Kashmir of 1990s?
The situation in the Valley is very, very bad. Whether it is worse than 1990s is hard to say. In the sense that 90s was bad in terms of terrorism. What is worse now is the defiance, the anger, the alienation, the disgust and a sense of hopelessness that we are getting from there.
As far as 90s are concerned, I donât think there are that many guns in the valley now as were there then. As per my knowledge, about 100 new boys have joined militancy since the Burhan Wani death. The total number of militants is being put around 300. And these figures tend to be exaggerated.
[quote]There were certainly several times more militants in 1990s. As far as terrorism and militancy goes, 90s was pretty bad, and we hope that it never gets that bad again. But the general atmosphere seems to be worse now. And we are going from bad to worse.[/quote]
âAb kya rakha hai, marna hi theek hai,â this is how people are now thinking. It is extremely sad. Every day you hear new stories. Not enough attempts are being made to stop this. We are just going downhill.
There are several significant periods in the past two decades. Many people pin down one particular year to explain the condition of present day Kashmir. Which year would you pick?
Yes, itâs true there were many watersheds in Kashmir. 1996 was a watershed. We got an elected government after a prolonged period of militancy. 2002 was perhaps more important, in the sense that the elections were considered to be held fairly by even international observers. This was also the only time when Hurriyat did not boycott elections.
The period between 2002 and 2008 was a generally good. Mufti Mohammed Sayeedâs three years were good, Ghulam Nabi Azadâs three years were not bad either. Then there was Amaranth land row. A lot of protests and demonstrations were held. Then 2010, and then 2012.
[quote]But whatâs happening now is different. It springs from 2014 elections. That election actually didnât satisfy anybody. The BJP was looking at mission 44, they got 25 seats, PDP was dreaming of 45 seats they got 28 seats. Mufti Sayeed had no option but to tie up with the BJP.
[/quote]
But this alliance has just not worked. Great hopes were pinned to this alliance, that it will bring Jammu and Kashmir together. But it took Jammu and Kashmir further apart. It polarised them even further. âNorth pole and south pole,â as Mufti referred to the two parties and the two regions that they represented, never met.
That is the main reason for this. The public reaction to last summerâs killing of Burhan Wani was only a symptom of disaffection with this alliance. Now you have a situation in which the youth involvement is growing and villagers are coming out to support and hide militants. The state police was condemned by the people first, then the CRPF got bad name, and now, unfortunately, army got drawn into this.
How do you see New Delhiâs role in all this?
Look, the Northern Army Commander Lieutenant General DS Hooda had said very wisely that if population is not on our side, there is nothing we can do, because it would mean massacring people. He also said we need to talk to Kashmiris.
This was such a big move that even Mirwaiz responded and said âwe are even prepared to talk to the army.â
But nothing has happened. New Delhi has not responded. Mufti was accused by local people of bringing RSS into the Valley. You see Mufti was an old hand at this sort of political manoeuvring. But it (handling the alliance and addressing Kashmir unrest) is beyond Mehbooba.
There are talks about J&K being headed towards governorâs rule. Do you think governorâs rule will help the situation?
No, I don't think so. Governor's rule is not the solution. Whatever PDP is, it needs to be supported by Delhi. Government should continue to be supported till its full term, 2020.


With best wishes,
from                    
                                             Click for Mumbai, IndiaForecast
Rahul,
Owner - The CYBUGLE & 60seconds
And Stock market group - TRADESMART

__._,_.___

Posted by: Rahul <bruntno1@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.


.

__,_._,___

Friday, April 28, 2017

Re: [rti4empowerment] When A Bank Comes Calling, Do You Have To Give Your Aadhaar Number?

 

Whats best for the country and its people counts.
Agree, but at what cost?
Sacrificing personal liberty and right to dissent for security guarantees none.

Fictitious accounts exist.
Multiple PAN numbers exist for one person.
Millions of bogus ration cards exist.
Lakhs of benami accounts exist.
Thousands of Shell comanies rxist.
Millions of illegal immigrants exist.
Again, agreed, but then so is the fact hat govt. employees work less than half 
hours required of them and that too reluctantly.
Fault lies with Government, and you want the price to be paid by the common man??
What this calls for accountability.
When the big fish escape (as is happening today too) and the small ones
get incarcerated, it removes trust from govt. functioning.

The Aadhar programme will only make our lives transparent to the govt. but not the govt. functioning to us.
And what is required - An accountability of the powers that be.
An Orwellian govt. is not the need of the hour,
A govt. that interferes in private lives the least is 

Blind faith in govt. (bhakts) will never understand nor have the capacity 
to critically analyse a situation.
All that they can do is shift the blame to foreign powers in order to 
maintain their beliefs without a basis in reality.
With best wishes,
from                    
                                             Click for Mumbai, IndiaForecast
Rahul,
Owner - The CYBUGLE & 60seconds
And Stock market group - TRADESMART



On Friday, April 28, 2017 1:03 PM, Sant Mathur <santmathur@gmail.com> wrote:


Whether X likes or Y doesn't like Aadhaar is not the question.
Whats best for the country and its people counts.
Fictitious accounts exist.
Multiple PAN numbers exist for one person.
Millions of bogus ration cards exist.
Lakhs of benami accounts exist.
Thousands of Shell comanies rxist.
Millions of illegal immigrants exist.

All of it has gone unchecked.The malaise has become cancerous,uncontrollable,
eating into the vitals of the nation.Destroying the nation insidiously,surely.
And what a joke! some foreign-funded NGOs and paid media would want exactly that.
Cold killing of the great nation INDIA.
It shall not happen Will not be allowed to happen.
Try as hard cunningly,through overt and covert methods as possible.
Wake up the right INDIANS.
SPM

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Rahul bruntno1@yahoo.com [rti4empowerment] <rti4empowerment-noreply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 


When A Bank Comes Calling, Do You Have To Give Your Aadhaar Number?

April 26, 2017, 5:35 pm April 25, 2017, 8:04 pm
 
Furnishing your Aadhaar number is now mandatory for filing tax returns. But tax authorities are not the only ones coming after your unique identity number. Banks are also pushing (and in some cases forcing) customers to link their accounts to their Aadhaar numbers.
Over 1.13 billion Indians now have an Aadhaar, a unique identity number, which, over time has become the government's preferred way of identifying citizens. Social benefits have been linked to the biometric based identity proof as a way to reduce leakages. Starting this fiscal year, it has also been made compulsory for tax filing - a decision which is under review at the Supreme Court. For banking services, however, the Aadhaar card is still only one of six acceptable KYC (know your customer) documents listed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).
Even so, some banks are coercing customers to furnish their Aadhaar details.
IDBI Bank, for instance, has sent emails to customers claiming that an Aadhaar linkage is mandatory to transact through banking channels. BloombergQuint accessed copies of the email sent by the bank to three different customers. The mail, produced here, tells customers that linking a savings account to Aadhaar is compulsory.
IDFC Bank's mailer IDFC Bank's mailer
The bank has not yet responded to a April 17 BloombergQuint email seeking comment.
Some customers of IDBI Bank have taken to Twitter to register their complaints. In response, the bank's official handle clarified that while it is not mandatory to link bank accounts to Aadhaar numbers, customers are encouraged to do so.
Other banks appear to have stayed away from the use of the word 'mandatory' in their communication but are encouraging customers to share their Aadhaar information. Only when specifically asked are banks clarifying that furnishing Aadhaar information is not mandatory.

Are Banks Permitted To Ask For Your Aadhaar?

The answer to that is - yes, but...
A reading of the Aadhaar Act shows that it allows the unique identification number to be used for KYC purposes by private agencies, such as banks, provided that the use is pursuant to set down laws and obligations.
Nothing contained in this Act shall prevent the use of Aadhaar number for establishing the identity of an individual for any purpose, whether by the State or any body corporate or person, pursuant to any law, for the time being in force, or any contract to this effect.
Aadhaar Act, 2016
In fact, nothing in the Aadhaar Act prevents banks from making Aadhaar linkage mandatory for customers.

But in a 2015 order the Supreme Court had said that the government cannot make Aadhaar mandatory.
We will also make it clear that the Aadhaar card Scheme is purely voluntary and it cannot be made mandatory till the matter is finally decided by this Court one way or the other.

Rahul Matthan, a partner at law firm Trilegal, explained that the Supreme Court's judgement applies to government provided services alone. This suggests that banks are on firm footing in asking for Aadhaar documentation.
"Private entities can of course insist on Aadhaar to authenticate you since the Supreme Court judgement only applies to government provided services which would be otherwise due to a citizen. But, an argument could be made that banks can't lock your money just because you don't have an Aadhaar number so they should at least be allowing you to access it and close your account," Matthan told BloombergQuint.
While the Aadhaar Act does not prevent banks from making it a mandatory document, prevailing Reserve Bank of India (RBI) regulations do. These guidelines list six documents, any of which can be used for KYC purposes.
The Government of India has notified six documents as 'Officially Valid Documents' (OVDs) for the purpose of producing proof of identity. These six documents are Passport, Driving Licence, Voters' Identity Card, PAN Card, Aadhaar Card issued by UIDAI and NREGA Job Card. You need to submit any one of these documents as proof of identity.
RBI Know Your Customer Guidelines

A 'Pre-Emptive' Demand

Bankers agree that the Aadhaar is not mandatory. In cases where there is a push back from customers, the banks acknowledge that customers have a choice in the matter. Yet their communications to customers, such as the one from HDFC Bank, suggest a sense of urgency and even a deadline. HDFC Bank declined to comment on this story.
HDFC Bank's mailer HDFC Bank's mailer
A senior official from a private bank, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that banks are acting preemptively because there is no clarity on whether Aadhaar would be made mandatory for banking in the future. In order to prevent a sudden need to link bank accounts to Aadhaar numbers, banks are trying to seed as many accounts with the unique identity as possible.
Rajiv Anand, head of retail banking at Axis Bank, said that lenders are also keen to link accounts to Aadhaar as it helps improve the customer experience. Axis Bank is using Aadhaar for multiple aspects of banking such as the Aadhaar-enabled Payment System - Aadhaar Pay and for e-KYC.
We are trying to open new bank accounts through Aadhaar also because it authenticates a customer using technology almost instantaneously and the customer experience is very good. At the same time, we are also using it to do re-KYC of existing accounts by using e-KYC. But for existing customers it is a slow process so we do campaigns for registering Aadhaar every few months and get people to link it.
Rajiv Anand, Head - Retail Banking, Axis Bank
Financial planners, meanwhile, suggest that Aadhaar might become mandatory for banks in the future though right now the choice lies with customers.
"Banks already have your PAN and other data. Providing Aadhaar can't be more dangerous so people should provide it but those who don't have it can still tell banks that they don't want it since there's no legal requirement yet," said financial advisor Gaurav Mashruwala.
BloombergQuint

With best wishes,
from                    
                                             Click for Mumbai, IndiaForecast
Rahul,
Owner - The CYBUGLE & 60seconds
And Stock market group - TRADESMART




__._,_.___

Posted by: Rahul <bruntno1@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)

Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.


.

__,_._,___

Thursday, April 27, 2017

[rti4empowerment] Chief Minister Haryana: Implement RERA in Haryana immediately covering existing undelivered projects save families

 

Hey,

I just signed the petition "Chief Minister Haryana: Implement RERA in Haryana immediately covering existing undelivered projects save families" and wanted to see if you could help by adding your name.

Our goal is to reach 15,000 signatures and we need more support. You can read more and sign the petition here:

https://www.change.org/p/chief-minister-haryana-implement-rera-in-haryana-immediately-covering-existing-undelivered-projects-save-families?recruiter=25861429&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=share_email_responsive

Thanks!
Urvi

Get Outlook for Android


__._,_.___

Posted by: urvi sukul singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.


.

__,_._,___

[rti4empowerment] What is a false flag operation? 42 FALSE-FLAG ATTACKS OFFICIALY ADMITTED TO

 

What is a false flag operation?

The contemporary term false flag describes covert operations that are designed to deceive in such a way that activities appear as though they are being carried out by entities, groups, or nations other than those who actually planned and executed them.False flag


A false flag operation is an operation conducted by one party or government and made to appear as though it were sponsored by another party or government. The term (although not the tactic) has its origins in the traditions of "honourable" naval warfare, where ships were required to sail under their own national flag in order that they could be identified. As people learned that being a sneaky bastard was much more fun much more effective than playing by the rules, ships began sailing under "false" colours, i.e. flying their enemy's flag in order to get close to their enemy, before swapping to their true colours and opening fire.

In the modern use of false flag tactics and operations, this final step is avoided entirely, making it difficult to identify what is really a false flag operation, and what is just some conspiracy nuts not trusting their own government. 

42 FALSE-FLAG ATTACKS OFFICIALY ADMITTED TO

Mirrored from Washington's Blog (due to their server being swamped)

Presidents, Prime Ministers, Congressmen, Generals, Spooks, Soldiers and Police ADMIT to False Flag Terror

In the following instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admit to it, either orally, in writing, or through photographs or videos:
(1) Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the "Mukden Incident" or the "Manchurian Incident". The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: "Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the 'Incident' was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army ...." And see this.
(2) A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that - under orders from the chief of the Gestapo - he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.
(3) Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.
(4) Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union's Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 - while blaming the attack on Finland - as a basis for launching the "Winter War" against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.
(5) The Russian Parliament, current Russian president Putin and former Soviet leader Gorbachev all admit that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940, and then falsely blamed it on the Nazis.
(6) The British government admits that - between 1946 and 1948 - it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called "Defenders of Arab Palestine", and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see this, this and this).
(7) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind "evidence" implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).
(8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950's to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.
(9) The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece - also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey - and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.
(10) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.
False flag attacks carried out pursuant to this program include - by way of example only:
(12) In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch "a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]".
(13) Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.
(14) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.
(15) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States - such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica - and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.
(16) The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: "The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro's subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo."
(17) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 ... manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.
(18) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that - as part of its "Cointelpro" campaign - the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.
(19) A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: "In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque." In response to the surprised correspondent's incredulous look the general said, "I am giving an example".
(20) A declassified 1973 CIA document reveals a program to train foreign police and troops on how to make booby traps, pretending that they were training them on how to investigate terrorist acts:
The Agency maintains liaison in varying degrees with foreign police/security organizations through its field stations ....
[CIA provides training sessions as follows:]
a. Providing trainees with basic knowledge in the uses of commercial and military demolitions and incendiaries as they may be applied in terrorism and industrial sabotage operations.
b. Introducing the trainees to commercially available materials and home laboratory techniques, likely to he used in the manufacture of explosives and incendiaries by terrorists or saboteurs.
c. Familiarizing the trainees with the concept of target analysis and operational planning that a saboteur or terrorist must employ.
d. Introducing the trainees to booby trapping devices and techniques giving practical experience with both manufactured and improvised devices through actual fabrication.
***
The program provides the trainees with ample opportunity to develop basic familiarity and use proficiently through handling, preparing and applying the various explosive charges, incendiary agents, terrorist devices and sabotage techniques.
(21) The German government admitted (and see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted "escape tools" on a prisoner - a member of the Red Army Faction - which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.
(22) A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi's compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.
(23) The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him "to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident", thus framing the ANC for the bombing.
(24) An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author).
(25) The United States Army's 1994 publication Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces - updated in 2004 - recommends employing terrorists and using false flag operations to destabilize leftist regimes in Latin America. False flag terrorist attacks were carried out in Latin America and other regions as part of the CIA's "Dirty Wars". And see this.
(26) Similarly, a CIA "psychological operations" manual prepared by a CIA contractor for the Nicaraguan Contra rebels noted the value of assassinating someone on your own side to create a "martyr" for the cause. The manual was authenticated by the U.S. government. The manual received so much publicity from Associated Press, Washington Post and other news coverage that - during the 1984 presidential debate - President Reagan was confronted with the following question on national television:
At this moment, we are confronted with the extraordinary story of a CIA guerrilla manual for the anti-Sandinista contras whom we are backing, which advocates not only assassinations of Sandinistas but the hiring of criminals to assassinate the guerrillas we are supporting in order to create martyrs.
(27) An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998, and determined that "elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked".
(28) Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion).
(29) As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the "war on terror".
(30)  At the July 2001 G8 Summit in Genoa, Italy, black-clad thugs were videotaped getting out of police cars, and were seen by an Italian MP carrying "iron bars inside the police station".  Subsequently, senior police officials in Genoa subsequently  admitted that police planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer at the G8 Summit, in order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters.
(31) The U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks - as shown by a memo from the defense secretary - as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is "overwhelming" that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein's regime, that Cheney "probably" had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not 'doing their homework' in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil ... not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction. Despite previous "lone wolf" claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers. (Many U.S. officials have alleged that 9/11 was a false flag operation by rogue elements of the U.S. government; but such a claim is beyond the scope of this discussion. The key point is that the U.S. falsely blamed it on Iraq, when it knew Iraq had nothing to do with it.).
(32) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.
(33) According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.
(34) The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.
(35) Police outside of a 2003 European Union summit in Greece were filmed planting Molotov cocktails on a peaceful protester
(36) Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having "our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda's ranks, causing operatives to doubt others' identities and to question the validity of communications."
(37) Similarly, in 2005, Professor John Arquilla of the Naval Postgraduate School - a renowned US defense analyst credited with developing the concept of 'netwar' - called for western intelligence services to create new "pseudo gang" terrorist groups, as a way of undermining "real" terror networks. According to Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, Arquilla's 'pseudo-gang' strategy was, Hersh reported, already being implemented by the Pentagon:
"Under Rumsfeld's new approach, I was told, US military operatives would be permitted to pose abroad as corrupt foreign businessmen seeking to buy contraband items that could be used in nuclear-weapons systems. In some cases, according to the Pentagon advisers, local citizens could be recruited and asked to join up with guerrillas or terrorists...
The new rules will enable the Special Forces community to set up what it calls 'action teams' in the target countries overseas which can be used to find and eliminate terrorist organizations. 'Do you remember the right-wing execution squads in El Salvador?' the former high-level intelligence official asked me, referring to the military-led gangs that committed atrocities in the early nineteen-eighties. 'We founded them and we financed them,' he said. 'The objective now is to recruit locals in any area we want. And we aren't going to tell Congress about it.' A former military officer, who has knowledge of the Pentagon's commando capabilities, said, 'We're going to be riding with the bad boys.'"
(38) United Press International reported in June 2005:
U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.
(39) Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.
(40) Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this).
(41) A 2008 US Army special operations field manual recommends that the U.S. military use surrogate non-state groups such as "paramilitary forces, individuals, businesses, foreign political organizations, resistant or insurgent organizations, expatriates, transnational terrorism adversaries, disillusioned transnational terrorism members, black marketers, and other social or political 'undesirables.'" The manual specifically acknowledged that U.S. special operations can involve both counterterrorism and "Terrorism" (as well as "transnational criminal activities, including narco-trafficking, illicit arms-dealing, and illegal financial transactions.")
(42)  The former head of Secret Services and Head of State of Italy (Francesco Cossiga) advised the 2008 minister in charge of the police, on how to deal with protests from teachers and students:
He should do what I did when I was Minister of the Interior ... infiltrate the movement with agents provocateurs inclined to do anything .... And after that, with the strength of the gained population consent,  ... beat them for blood and beat for blood also those teachers that incite them. Especially the teachers. Not the elderly, of course, but the girl teachers yes.
(43) At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.
(44) Egyptian politicians admitted (and see this) that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.
(45) Rioters who discredited the peaceful protests against the swearing in of the Mexican president in 2012 admitted that they were paid 300 pesos each to destroy everything in their path. According to Wikipedia, photos also show the vandals waiting in groups behind police lines prior to the violence.
(46) A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat.
(47) On November 20, 2014, Mexican agent provocateurs were transported by army vehicles to participate in the 2014 Iguala mass kidnapping protests, as was shown by videos and pictures distributed via social networks.
(48) The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence - Prince Bandar - recently admitted that the Saudi government controls "Chechen" terrorists.
(49) High-level American sources admitted that the Turkish government - a fellow NATO country - carried out the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government; and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.
(50) The Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to frame others. Ukrainian officials admit that the Ukrainian snipers fired on both sides, to create maximum chaos.
(51) Britain's spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out "digital false flag" attacks on targets, framing people by writing offensive or unlawful material ... and blaming it on the target.
(52) U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then "drop" automatic weapons near their body so they can pretend they were militants
(53) Similarly, police frame innocent people for crimes they didn't commit. The practice is so well-known that the New York Times noted in 1981:
In police jargon, a throwdown is a weapon planted on a victim.
Newsweek reported in 1999:
Perez, himself a former [Los Angeles Police Department] cop, was caught stealing eight pounds of cocaine from police evidence lockers. After pleading guilty in September, he bargained for a lighter sentence by telling an appalling story of attempted murder and a "throwdown"-police slang for a weapon planted by cops to make a shooting legally justifiable. Perez said he and his partner, Officer Nino Durden, shot an unarmed 18th Street Gang member named Javier Ovando, then planted a semiautomatic rifle on the unconscious suspect and claimed that Ovando had tried to shoot them during a stakeout.
Wikipedia notes:
As part of his plea bargain, Perez implicated scores of officers from the Rampart Division's anti-gang unit, describing routinely beating gang members, planting evidence on suspects, falsifying reports and covering up unprovoked shootings.
(As a side note - and while not technically false flag attacks - police have been busted framing innocent people in many other ways, as well.)
(54) A former U.S. intelligence officer recently alleged:
Most terrorists are false flag terrorists or are created by our own security services.
(55) The head and special agent in charge of the FBI's Los Angeles office said that most terror attacks are committed by the CIA and FBI as false flags.  Similarly, the director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan - Lt. General William Odom said:
By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In '78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism - in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.
(audio here).
(56) Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the "benefits" of of false flags to justify their political agenda:
"Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death".
- Adolph Hitler
"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
- Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.
"The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened".
- Josef Stalin
Postscript: Private parties - such as NBC News, as well as Muslims, Jews, Scientologists, African-Americans and Neo-Nazis - play this game as well.
With best wishes,
from                    
                                             Click for Mumbai, IndiaForecast
Rahul,
Owner - The CYBUGLE & 60seconds
And Stock market group - TRADESMART

__._,_.___

Posted by: Rahul <bruntno1@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.


.

__,_._,___