Sunday, December 22, 2013

[rti4empowerment] सच्चर कमेटी की शिफारिशों पर सोयी पड़ी है यूपी की सरकार

 


उर्वशी शर्मा उर्वशी शर्मा

मैं कभी कभी सोचती हूँ कि सार्वजनिक जीवन में नेता बन जाने के बाद व्यक्ति कितना  बदल जाता है| वह  हर जगह जन सरोकार के मुद्दे नहीं बल्कि अपने वोट ही  तलाशता रहता है | बात मुसलमानों से शुरू करती हूँ| मुलायम सिंह अपने आप को मुसलमानों का मसीहा कहते है और गाहे-बगाहे अयोध्या-बाबरी मस्जिद प्रकरण पर भोले भाले मुसलमानों की धार्मिक भावनाओं को भड़काकर उनको अपने पाले में करने का प्रयास करते हैं तो वही मायावती हैं जो जब तब मुस्लिम हितों को सर्वोपरि बताते हुए विशाल रैलियां करते हुए मुसलमानों को  लुभाने का प्रयास करती हैं l 18 महीने के कार्यकाल में ही अखिलेश ने तो अपने आपको वहाँ खड़ा कर दिया है जहाँ जनता ने उनसे कोई भी उम्मीद करना ही छोड़ दिया है | मेरा मानना है कि  आज मनमोहन सिंह भी अखिलेश से अधिक स्वतंत्र निर्णय ले लेते हैं| पर इन सबमें मुसलमानों के जमीनी विकास के मुद्दे कही पीछे छूटते जा रहे हैं और सरकारें और विपक्ष अपने फायदे के लिए बेबजह की बयानबाजी से आगे नहीं आ पाया है |

गौरतलब है कि 9 मार्च 2005 को भारत के प्रधानमंत्री ने भारत में मुसलमानों के सामाजिक,आर्थिक और शैक्षिक स्थिति के आंकलन के लिए सात सदस्यीय उच्च स्तरीय समिति का कथन किया था| जस्टिस सच्चर की अध्यक्षता वाली इस समिति ने 17 नवम्बर 2006 को अपनी शिफारिशें प्रधान मंत्री को सौंप दीं जो 30  नवम्बर 2006 को लोक सभा के पटल पर रखीं गयीं | 403 पेज की इस रिपोर्ट में मुसलामानों की  सामाजिक,आर्थिक और शैक्षिक स्थिति में सुधार की बुनियादी शिफारिशें की थीं|

मैंने पिछले साल 26 नवम्बर को उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार से आरटीआई के तहत यह जानना चाहा था कि आखिर मुसलमानों के हितों का ढोल पीटने बाली सरकारों ने इस अहम् रिपोर्ट पर अमल कर मुसलमानों का बुनियादी विकास कर उनको समाज की मुख्यधारा में लाने के लिए क्या किया है|  आपको यह जानकार आश्चर्य होगा कि एक माह में सूचना देने की अनिवार्यता होने पर भी इस अहम्  मुद्दे पर उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार ने मुझे सूचना देने में एक साल से भी अधिक लगा दिया| सूचना आयोग के दखल के बाद उत्तर प्रदेश शासन के अल्पसंख्यक कल्याण एवं वक्फ अनुभाग-4  के अनु सचिव और जन सूचना अधिकारी मनी राम ने बीते 9 दिसम्बर के पत्र के माध्यम से हो सूचना दी हैं वह बेहद चौंकाने वाली होने के साथ साथ उत्तर प्रदेश की सरकारों के कथित मुसलमान-प्रेम की ढोल की पोल भी उजागर करती है|

मनी राम के इस पत्र के अनुसार उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार द्वारा सच्चर कमेटी की संस्तुतियों को प्रभावी ढंग से लागू करने हेतु अभी तक कोई नियम /विनियम/शासनादेश आदि निर्गत नहीं किया गया है| मनीराम ने इस सम्बन्ध में शून्य सूचना का होना भी लिखा है|

बड़ा सवाल है कि 30 नवम्बर 2006 से अब तक की सात साल से ज्यादा की अवधि में मुलायम सिंह,मायावती और अखिलेश जैसे अपने आप को मुसलमानों का झंडाबरदार कहने वाले नेता सूबे के मुखिया रहे हैं जो जब-तब मुसलमानों के लिए लोक लुभावन घोषणाएं तो प्रायः ही करते रहे है पर यह दुर्भाग्यपूर्ण है कि प्रदेश के  मुसलमानों के बुनियादी मुद्दों को सम्बोधित करने बाली  इस रिपोर्ट पर सिलसिलेवार अमल कर मुसलमानों को सामाजिक, आर्थिक और शैक्षिक रूप से आत्मनिर्भर बनाकर उनको समाज की मुख्यधारा में लाने का कोई भी प्रयास  किया ही नहीं गया है|

मैं इस सम्बन्ध में अखिलेश से अपील करती हूँ कि वे दिखावटी वादों से हटकर बुनियादी विकास के मुद्दों पर काम करें क्योंकि कमजोर बुनियादों पर बनी आलीशान इमारतें भी अधिक समय तक खड़ी नहीं रह पाती हैं| मैं अखिलेश को सच्चर कमेटी की रिपोर्ट को सिलसिलेवार लागू करने के लिए ज्ञापन भी दे रही हूँ और जल्द ही इस सम्बन्ध में जन-आंदोलन भी चलाया जायेगा|

उर्वशी शर्मा 

सामाजिक कार्यकर्ता

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Re: [rti4empowerment] RE: "innocent till proven guilty"

 

We also need to relook at the right of the accused to defend!
The accused has to tell the truth to his advocate about the crime and he formulates a line of defence, all cooked up! In case of a real accused the advocate help him misrepresent the case, and that is his source of livelyhood!! If the advocate is clever he can carry on the case for 20-30- or more years frustrating the real complainant who often appears to be the weakest! Accused, in the present set up of governance, has "connections"! Now inspite of all the efforts of the advocate to save the accused if the complainant wins the case is it not to be considered that the defence advocate and his henchman have been aiding and abetting the accused in wrongly presnting the case to the court, assuming that the court's stand is not supicious! In the circumstances the defense advocate and his henchman should be severely punished for taking the 20 or 30 years of the court time defending the accused!! This should serve as a deterent! This is my personal view, I am not a lawyer!!    


On Saturday, 21 December 2013 3:57 PM, Victor Cooper <victor99cooper@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
Dear Mr. / Ms. Congress, BJP, Aalu, SP, Babus, Judges, et al:
For a number of years we have been hearing from you this humbug revolving around the concept of "innocent till proven guilty" stuff.
Well, this concept would have been acceptable had you not converted us into a banana / mango type over the past 66 years since independence, and justice was swift, honest, and assured as it is intended to be in a properly functioning democracy.
So pals, meeeooow and bow-wow too. Why should you not be held "guilty till proven innocent". Why should you not face the same music that the ordinary citizen has to face with justice taking 20, 30, or 50 years?
After all, it was your foremost duty, which you failed to perform, to have increased the number of judges five-fold so that justice was swift, honest, and assured. Had you so performed your duty, the concept of "innocent till proved guilty" would have been fine. But under the given circumstances and conditions, it is appropriate that you be held to be "guilty till proven innocent".
 
So, stop whining. MMmmmmeeeeoooowwwww. Bow-wow.
 
Victor
 


__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Saturday, December 21, 2013

[rti4empowerment] RTI Seminar & RTI Ratna Award Function in Lucknow pics

 
__,_._,___

[rti4empowerment] RE: "innocent till proven guilty"

 

Dear Mr. / Ms. Congress, BJP, Aalu, SP, Babus, Judges, et al:
For a number of years we have been hearing from you this humbug revolving around the concept of "innocent till proven guilty" stuff.
Well, this concept would have been acceptable had you not converted us into a banana / mango type over the past 66 years since independence, and justice was swift, honest, and assured as it is intended to be in a properly functioning democracy.
So pals, meeeooow and bow-wow too. Why should you not be held "guilty till proven innocent". Why should you not face the same music that the ordinary citizen has to face with justice taking 20, 30, or 50 years?
After all, it was your foremost duty, which you failed to perform, to have increased the number of judges five-fold so that justice was swift, honest, and assured. Had you so performed your duty, the concept of "innocent till proved guilty" would have been fine. But under the given circumstances and conditions, it is appropriate that you be held to be "guilty till proven innocent".
 
So, stop whining. MMmmmmeeeeoooowwwww. Bow-wow.
 
Victor
 

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Friday, December 20, 2013

[rti4empowerment] Fwd: Pl. advise whther to pay increased BMC property tax and where to pay from????

 



Dear All, 

I have received today notice from BMC demanding increased property tax from back date from 2010. The notice is claiming Rs. 25967/- . In case of failure to pay they have threatened to levy penalty of 2% per month that is 24% per year besides penal action and auctioning the property.

Sir/s, 

Out of three tenants and two trespassers only one tenant pays Rs 34 pm to me as rent. 

The tenant Chadha has two cars worth Rs 13 lacs and all other luxury but does not pay rent as he and other defaulters know that I will have to spend life and Rs. 1 lac minimum in court case for trying to recover rent which may still be elusive as he will deposit in court. 

The Purohits lost case in 2009 and were decreed but went in to 2 bench appeal where they have hired Ad  D C mehta who knows how to delay matter and does not us law but uses machinery for delaying. Ad mehta is a very costly advocate but he claimed my client is not able to pay more then Rs 200/- p.m. as mesne profit . It is on the record of court that his client has more then 5 vehicles, palatial bungalow, travel by air several time to US and other countries, has office and house in Newyork too. But court fixed mesne profit as only Rs 1000/- which I can not withdraw till order ( which is elusive for 5 years) . I asked thru RTI info on how the court has fixed in other mesne profit  but court has only made me run here and there and denied info on procedural ground . I asked AAP volunteer to file similar RTI in same court but he too got tired. 

I am not allowed to increase rent as much as BMC or others hike be it railways, professionals, grocers, parking lot wala's, milk vendor,Reliance energy, schools, colleges, doctors, hospitals, hotels and so on. . 

I am not allowed to charge interest more then 9% from defaulting tenants and can not evict them but BMC is charging 24% interest and can take penal action and also auction my property. 

I wonder what sin I had committed in last life that I am not a son of IAS,IPS, JUDGE, VIP etc ??? Why I am a AAM Admi? 

Sir do I pay these taxes ???? Pl. advise?? 

Also advise where do I get these funds if I do not have post where I can get bribe or commit scam?? 

Thanks and Regards,
Alok Tholiya,
09324225699 /   02226125699/26173203

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

[rti4empowerment] Pl. advise whther to pay increased BMC property tax and where to pay from????

 

Dear All, 

I have received today notice from BMC demanding increased property tax from back date from 2010. The notice is claiming Rs. 25967/- . In case of failure to pay they have threatened to levy penalty of 2% per month that is 24% per year besides penal action and auctioning the property.

Sir/s, 

Out of three tenants and two trespassers only one tenant pays Rs 34 pm to me as rent. 

The tenant Chadha has two cars worth Rs 13 lacs and all other luxury but does not pay rent as he and other defaulters know that I will have to spend life and Rs. 1 lac minimum in court case for trying to recover rent which may still be elusive as he will deposit in court. 

The Purohits lost case in 2009 and were decreed but went in to 2 bench appeal where they have hired Ad  D C mehta who knows how to delay matter and does not us law but uses machinery for delaying. Ad mehta is a very costly advocate but he claimed my client is not able to pay more then Rs 200/- p.m. as mesne profit . It is on the record of court that his client has more then 5 vehicles, palatial bungalow, travel by air several time to US and other countries, has office and house in Newyork too. But court fixed mesne profit as only Rs 1000/- which I can not withdraw till order ( which is elusive for 5 years) . I asked thru RTI info on how the court has fixed in other mesne profit  but court has only made me run here and there and denied info on procedural ground . I asked AAP volunteer to file similar RTI in same court but he too got tired. 

I am not allowed to increase rent as much as BMC or others hike be it railways, professionals, grocers, parking lot wala's, milk vendor,Reliance energy, schools, colleges, doctors, hospitals, hotels and so on. . 

I am not allowed to charge interest more then 9% from defaulting tenants and can not evict them but BMC is charging 24% interest and can take penal action and also auction my property. 

I wonder what sin I had committed in last life that I am not a son of IAS,IPS, JUDGE, VIP etc ??? Why I am a AAM Admi? 

Sir do I pay these taxes ???? Pl. advise?? 

Also advise where do I get these funds if I do not have post where I can get bribe or commit scam?? 

Thanks and Regards,
Alok Tholiya,
09324225699 /   02226125699/26173203


"My individual freedom to live as I choose, to come and go as I choose, to believe or not believe as I individually choose.  For me every wind that blows carries message of freedom.  It carries it everywhere from sea to shining sea. I decide my freedom and not the society and the puppets of high society." For me Samaj Rachana is for suraksha and not for pleasing haves and maligning have nots. Samaj Rachana is for bringing people of all strata together at same level, to give place of pride to those live and sacrifice for Samaj and not for those who exploit Samaj and then show off status. So live and roar like a lion in samaj and not for wagging tail.  ...........Alok 

• Pl. fwd./ circulate this mail if you think the issues raised here needs wider audience.

• Let us make our city beautiful, disciplined and Loveable.
Let us handover to our future generation a better place to live in.

www.digambarjains.com  : The matrimonial web site for Digambar Jains

• To subscribe to my very popular yahoogroup: 
Send blank mail to: menow-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

[rti4empowerment] HC seeks reply in petition for 5 days week office

 

Friends,

I feel truly happy to stated that in the petition filed by me, along with policeman Satish Singh as regards different working schemes in district and headquarter offices, the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench has sought reply from the State government within a week. The next day of hearing is on 03 January 2014.

The bench of Justice Devi Prasad Singh and Justice Ashok Pal Singh prima-facie agreed with our counsel Asok Pande that different offices having similar job profile can't have different number of working days per week and hence asked reply on why district offices are 5-days week and Headquarters office 6-days week.

The petition said that the UP government introduced the five days working scheme on 30 October 2004 for "healthy work culture in administration, working efficiency and better productivity." But this was limited only to Head of Department (HOD) offices and not to district offices having very similar job requirements. Hence the we had prayed to allow 5 days week even in district offices.

What it once again shows is that we can all contribute our bit to structural improvements through available legal means. 

Copy of Petition--


Amitabh Thakur
Lucknow
# 094155-34526

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___