[rti4empowerment] Fwd: [aloktholiya] Alok on Quota

 

If one runs govt honestly then all citizens will be benefited. No need for any reservations. If any more reservations come then v shall oppose. Muslims , jains , Sikhs etc r enjoying minority status so they can build their own educational institutes and get quota for 50% seats. Similarly there r benefits for starting business. No more quota. Besides if one keeps producing children and then want quota then that is limit. Every citizen must oppose quota demand tooth and nail. Quota must be given in jobs to those who do family planning after first child . Not to those who keep breeding uncontrollably.

--
Posted By Blogger to aloktholiya at 3/31/2014 09:16:00 AM

__._,_.___

Reply via web post

Reply to sender

Reply to group

Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Visit Your Group

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

[rti4empowerment] GP1:: Removal of Political Defacement Throughout India [2 Attachments]

 

[Attachment(s) from Col Shivraj included below]

Dear Friends,

After the announcement of the Elections, Model Code of Conduct has come into Force, in that, the Political Parties can not Deface any property. They can put up their Hoardings only at the designated places as decided by the civic agencies.  All other Hoardings, Posters, Banners and Writings on the Wall are illegal and are being removed under the arrangements of the Chief Electoral Officers of the State. CEOs have also promulgated the TOLL FREE Number where the citizens can inform the CEO about such Defacement.

These orders have been promulgated for the entire India.

We are at Chennai. Earlier the Political Defacement could be seen all over. But all that has been removed. The city looks better and cleaner. There is a TOLL FREE number ( 18004257012 ) and an email ID chennaielectioncomplaints@gmail.com  where the citizens can inform any Defacement still left or any new one coming up.

We have information that these Defacement have been removed throughout Tamil Nadu.

We request citizens of India to ensure that such Defacement are removed from their areas, if not already done.

We must use this opportunity and help the civic authorities in removing the Non-political Defacement as well under the  Prevention of Defacement ACTs of the State.

THIS IS A ONE TIME JOB.

Request all members to spread this message throughout India.

regards
Col Shivraj

210 Munirka Vihar

New Delhi-110067

Phone: 26102999

Mob: 9810433842
http://www.google.com/profiles/colshivraj.
http://www.facebook.com/poster.hatao
MY DELHI , POSTER and NOISE FREE DELHI

 MOV_1120.mp4

__._,_.___

Attachment(s) from Col Shivraj | View attachments on the web

1 of 1 Photo(s)

Col Shivraj removing Poster DSC_1124.jpg

1 of 1 File(s)

DPDP Act 2007.docx

Reply via web post

Reply to sender

Reply to group

Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Visit Your Group

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

[rti4empowerment] HC- seek instruction in PIL on language teacher TET, Urdu teachers

 

HC- seek instruction in PIL on language teacher TET, Urdu teachers

The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench today asked the UP Government counsel to seek instructions and present facts as regards the PIL filed by me against Uttar Pradesh Teacher's Eligibility Test (UP-TET) for language teachers.

The bench consisting of Justices Imtiyaz Murtaza and D K Upadhyaya gave this order after hearing all the parties and fixed Monday (31 March) as the next date of hearing.

The PIL says that the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) is the designated authority to fix minimum qualification for appointment of teachers, which has issued "Guidelines for conducting Teacher Eligibility Test (TET)" dated 11 February 2011. These Guidelines prescribe five subjects, including child Development and Pedagogy, two Languages, Mathematics and Environmental Studies for TET.

Unlike this mandatory provision, in UP a new class of language teachers have been created for whom the TET consists only of child development and pedagogy and the concerned language.

Calling it as being completely against the NCTE guidelines and detrimental to elementary education, I prayed to cancel all TETs for language teachers and the appointment to Assistance Urdu teachers done through these TET.

Copy of PIL---
http://amitabhandnutan.blogspot.in/2014/03/copy-of-pil-in-up-language-teachers.html

Dr Nutan Thakur
# 094155-34525

__._,_.___

Reply via web post

Reply to sender

Reply to group

Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Visit Your Group

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

[rti4empowerment] PIL against Sahara Credit Cooperative Society to be heard by High Court [1 Attachment]

 

[Attachment(s) from Amitabh Thakur included below]

PIL against Sahara Credit Cooperative Society to be heard by High Court

The PIL filed by me and Nutan about the alleged impropriety of Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Limited shall be heard by the Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court along with the Review petition filed in this regards.

The PIL says that Sahara Credit has been registered as a Cooperative society under the Multi State cooperative Act 2002, which is supposed to work for collective goals by pooling in the resources. But it is collecting public money through schemes like Sahara E shine, Sahara A select, Sahara Minor, Sahara M Benefit and Sahara U Golden, operated through workers of Sahara India, which comes as being a circuitous route for collection of public money, thereby seriously jeopardizing investors' interest.

Hence we had prayed for enquiry into the above facts to ensure the complete compliance of the laws prescribed for collection of public money.

The PIL was previously dismissed by the Court on grounds of us saying that we would not argue the matter before the given bench but today the bench consisting of Justice Imtiyaz Murtaza and Justice D K Upadhyaya agreed to hear the matter along with the Review petition after we tendered unconditional apology and stated that we shall be presenting all the facts before the Court in this  matter of great public interest.

Friends are requested to provide any further information in this matter of larger public interest.

Enclosed- 1.  Previous order of the High Court

2. Copy of PIL, review petition

 

http://amitabhandnutan.blogspot.in/2014/03/review-petition-in-pil-against-sahara.html

http://amitabhandnutan.blogspot.in/2014/03/copy-of-pil-regarding-sahara-credit.html

Amitabh Thakur
# 094155-34526

Order of High Court----

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

?Court No. - 2
Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 2008 of 2014
Petitioner :- Amitabh Thakur & Another [P.I.L.]
Respondent :- Union Of India Thr.Secy.Agriculture & Cooperation Deptt.&Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- Amitabh Thakur (Inperson),Dr.Nutan Thakur (Inperson
Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.
Hon'ble Imtiyaz Murtaza,J.
Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J.

Heard Sri Amitabh Thakur, petitioner no.1 and Dr. Nutan Thakur, petitioner no.2 in person.
After hearing the arguments at some length, when the Court required the petitioner no.1 to answer certain queries on the issue as to how does he substantiate his submission that the schemes quoted in annexure no.1 to the writ petition are being run by respondent no.6, Sri Amitabh Thakur submitted that the perspective of the Court, vis-a-vis annexure no.1 and the schemes quoted therein, are different than his perspective.
On the aforesaid submission made, the Court specifically told Sri. Amitabh Thakur, petitioner no.1 that he is arguing the matter before a Court of law and that the Court is not supposed to enter into or entertain any kind of debate and further that when a person approaches the Court he has to substantiate his assertions and arguments. At this observation of the Court, Sri. Amitabh Thakur appeared dissatisfied and stated that he did not want to argue this matter any further.
Thereafter, when the Court required the petitioner no.2 to answer the queries, she also submitted that once the petitioner no.1 does not intend to argue the case before the Court, she also does not intend to do so.
In these circumstances, the Court is left with no option but to dismiss the petition.
Thus, the writ petition is hereby dismissed.
After passing the order, Sri. Amitabh Thakur, petitioner no.1 further submitted that what he intended to convey to the Court was that he did not want to argue the matter before this particular Bench.
We may, at this juncture, only state that Benches in the High Court exercise their jurisdiction as per roster assigned by Hon'ble the Chief Justice. The instant petition has been filed in the shape of Public Interest Litigation. As per roster determined by the Hon'ble Chief Justice, this Bench has been assigned the said jurisdiction. Further, no person who is a party to a proceeding before this Court can be permitted to argue cases before a Bench of his choice.
Accordingly, the aforesaid submission made by Sri. Amitabh Thakur, petitioner no.1 is hereby rejected.
Order Date :- 10.3.2014/Shahnaz

__._,_.___

Attachment(s) from Amitabh Thakur | View attachments on the web

1 of 1 File(s)

Sahara further complaints1.docx

Reply via web post

Reply to sender

Reply to group

Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Visit Your Group

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

[rti4empowerment] Tutorial for Purchase of e-IPO for Payment of RTI Fee [3 Attachments]

 

[Attachment(s) from Lokesh Batra included below]

Tutorial for Purchase of  e-IPO for Payment of RTI Fee

 

 

 1.   I have been getting requests from RTI friends seeking Guidance regarding how to Purchase e-IPO (Electronic Indian Postal Order) Online from website of "INDIA POST".

 

 

2.   e-IPO Facility is a big boon as it is available 24x7 for Payment of RTI Fee in 2,496 Central Public Authorities...including 176 Indian Missions, NCT Delhi and U.Ts. I have been using it extensively.

 

 

3.   To start with it requires only one time registration and creating Profile... While Passport details are must for Indian Citizens' abroad..... for Citizens in India Mobile number and eMail ID required.

 

 

4.   In last 40 days or so since it was opened for citizen's in India... it has been used by number of (hundreds) of applicants.

 

 

5,   I am attaching three DoPT O.Ms dated 22 March 2013, 07 Oct 2013 and 13 Feb 2014.

 

 

6.   These  are related to Launching of e-IPO on 22 March 2013, initially for "Indian Citizens' abroad" and its subsequent growth till it was opened to "Citizens' Living in India" on 13 February 2014.

 

 

7.    The DoPT three O.Ms. explain it all.

 

 

8.  You may also go thru e-IPO Tutorial prepared by RTI Activist Vishal K......immediately after e-IPO was first time launched on 22 March 2013.

 

 

9.   e-IPO Tutorial Link uploaded on you Tube is given below :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0z2HDypB8O0

 

10.   For those who fear Online Payment thru Debit/Credit Cards....... I suggest open an account with very little balance and use that for making Payment Online for purchase of e-IPO,... Credit Card may be a better choice. 

Regards,

Lokesh

{Commodore Lokesh K. Batra (Retd.)}

__._,_.___

Attachment(s) from Lokesh Batra | View attachments on the web

3 of 3 File(s)

DoPT O.M dated 22 March 2013.pdf

DoPT O.M dated 07 Oct 2013.pdf

DoPT O.M dated 13 Feb 2014.pdf

Reply via web post

Reply to sender

Reply to group

Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Visit Your Group

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

[rti4empowerment] FIR against two SGPGI doctors for negligent killing

 

FIR against two SGPGI doctors for negligent killing

An FIR against Dr Vivek Anand Saraswat and Dr Srijeeth Venugopal of Gastroenterology department of SGPGI, Lucknow has been registered in PGI police station, Lucknow for negligently killing a patient through improper injection. 

As per the FIR, Suresh Chandra Shukla of Aliganj took his wife Mamata Shukla, suffering from Hepatitis-C, to SGPGI, where in March 2012, these doctors gave her Thymocin Alpha-1 injection more than once.

This injection immediately reacted on Ms Shukla's body leading to severe complications, who was taken to Medanta hospital, Gurgaon where she was told that she got Liver cancer due to this injection. It finally lead to her death on 09 November 2011.

Sri Shukla later found that Thymocin Alpha-1 is a trial drug known to have bone cancer as its side-effect and Central Drug Standard Control Organization, Government of India gives permission to its use only for Hepatitis B patients, yet the two doctors used this drug on his wife as a trial case.

He gave an FIR to the police station and SSP, Lucknow who did not register it. Finally he came to me through common friends and I wrote to SSP and IG after which an FIR No 87/2014 under sections 269 and 304A IPC has been registered against the two doctors, being investigated by SI Uma Shankar Sharma.

Prima facie it seems to be a serious and important case of doctor's negligence. Let us see what comes out of the investigation.

Amitabh Thakur

# 094155-34526

__._,_.___

Reply via web post

Reply to sender

Reply to group

Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Visit Your Group

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

[rti4empowerment] HC seeks reply in PIL to stop contesting from multiple MLA/MP seats

 

HC seeks reply in PIL to stop contesting from multiple MLA/MP seats

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court, today sought replies from the Ministry of Law and Justice and the Election Commission of India in a PIL filed by me and husband IPS officer Amitabh Thakur asking for complete ban on any persons contesting from more than one seat in the elections for Parliament and the State Assemblies.

After hearing the petitioners' counsel Asok Pande, Additional Solicitor General K C Kaushik for Union of India and Manish Kumar for the Election Commission, the bench consisting of Justice Imtiyaz Murtaza and Justice D K Upadhyaya issued notices to the respondents to file their reply with 6 weeks.

The PIL says that Section 33(7) of the Representation of Peoples Act 1951 permits a person to contest from two places in these elections. Before 1996, a person could contest from any number of seats.

As per the petitioners, this permission to contest and win in the same legislative body from two places is against the various constitutional provisions including Article 101 and 190 related with vacancies of seats in these legislative bodies because these Articles provide specific methods of vacation of seats, which does not include vacation of seats for being elected at two places in the same house, hence they prayed for declaring such multiple contests as ultra-vires to the Constitution.

Copy of PIL---

http://amitabhandnutan.blogspot.in/2014/03/copy-of-pil-to-stop-multiple-seat.html

Dr Nutan Thakur
# 094155-34525

__._,_.___

Reply via web post

Reply to sender

Reply to group

Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (2)

Visit Your Group

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

[rti4empowerment] HC seeks reply in PIL to stop contesting from multiple MLA/MP seats

 

HC seeks reply in PIL to stop contesting from multiple MLA/MP seats

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court, today sought replies from the Ministry of Law and Justice and the Election Commission of India in the PIL filed by me and wife Nutan praying for complete ban on any persons contesting from more than one seat in the elections for Parliament and the State Assemblies.

After hearing the petitioners' counsel Asok Pande, Additional Solicitor General K C Kaushik for Union of India and Manish Kumar for the Election Commission, the bench consisting of Justice Imtiyaz Murtaza and Justice D K Upadhyaya issued notices to the respondents to file their reply with 6 weeks.

The PIL says that Section 33(7) of the Representation of Peoples Act 1951 permits a person to contest from two places in these elections. Before 1996, a person could contest from any number of seats.

As per us, this permission to contest and win in the same legislative body from two places is against the various constitutional provisions including Article 101 and 190 related with vacancies of seats in these legislative bodies because these Articles provide specific methods of vacation of seats, which does not include vacation of seats for being elected at two places in the same house, hence they prayed for declaring such multiple contests as ultra-vires to the Constitution.

Here is a copy of the PIL, for ur kind perusal and suggestions--

http://amitabhandnutan.blogspot.in/2014/03/copy-of-pil-to-stop-multiple-seat.html

Amitabh Thakur
# 094155-34526

__._,_.___

Reply via web post

Reply to sender

Reply to group

Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Visit Your Group

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___